Front Page
John Sabotta
Lynette Warren
Greenmarket
Wine
Movie Houses
On Stage
Restaurants/Bars
|
Union Square Station
Malone
12/3
No Believing Gore; Honest Joe's
Best Crisis
Don't believe Al Gore
when he reassures that it will all be over "by the middle of
December." Back a few weeks he promised to abide by the results of the hand
recounts completed at the new deadline (now one long week past) set by the Florida
Supreme Court.
That's a simple one to figure out: He didn't really mean the deadline, he
meant if he had somehow pulled ahead in the count by the deadline. Likewise,
several days ago he offered that he would certainly have to abide by any
decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court. Now he has signaled that
he'll just keep going if the high court rules against him.
How far will he take it? Start with the meeting of the Electoral College
on December 18. Anyone can write Gore's revised script and hear his
condescending voice at this point: "I
have no power, no one does, over the conscience or the choice of any elector who
might switch his or her previously committed vote?" Particularly not when
it comes to Larry Flynt-style sexual blackmail threatening to ruin a
life, or a suddenly fat offshore account offering eternal serenity.
If you think such a scenario is impossible, just stop for two seconds and take a
look around at the scene as it already is. Do you remember Honest Joe
Lieberman, the New Conscience of the Senate? Well, he's now so consumed by
his craving for power that he engages personally in Big Lie methods that
make the great Clinton Agit-Prop Machine of the
impeachment interregnum look like a Girl Scout troop planning the annual
cookie drive.
The best Honest Joe Moment of the past week was his cracked voice condemnation
of the decision by the Florida Legislature to hold a special session (to
consider appointing a slate of electors) as "unprecedented," followed
with the subtle threat that it would provoke a "Constitutional
crisis." Honest Joe should know something about "unprecedented"
moves, particularly election contests based on voter error where the working
principle is to scare up loose votes in Democratic strongholds while moaning on
about the "will of the people," most of whom live in the other 63
counties in Florida.
And if no electors can have their consciences worked on by shadow operatives for
the power mad Gore, how about Congress in January, with bloodbaths on the
floor
of both the House and the Senate as the Florida electors are challenged.
Then that Constitutional crisis that Honest Joe agonized over could work nicely
to Joe's benefit, of course. Why, he might even be willing to, say, accept the
Senate making him Vice President, per the Constitution, if the House, in
"partisan madness," votes to make George Bush President. It's the kind
of Constitutional crisis Honest Joe could spend four years savoring as "The
regrettable consequence of a wrongly decided presidential contest, yet I'm proud
to serve as vindication that the true voice of the people has been at least
partially heard."
That's one it-can't-go-beyond Inauguration Day scenario, but indeed it can go
beyond Inauguration Day. If a stand-off occurs in the House and the Senate, or
between the House and the Senate, then an Acting President must be appointed to
start serving on January 20th until the situation is worked out, per the
Twentieth Amendment. Then, of course, we'll hear about the only man who could
bring credibility to the role, a man who has established himself as a world
statesman, and is still young enough to take on the great burden during this
great national crisis, Jimmy Carter.
11/28
Playing
the Margin of Error; Boy Cries Wolf
My attorney
passed on to me from another source the best bottom-line analysis of
what Al Gore and his cohorts have been up to. In the name of
fairness, Gore & Co. want to reduce the margin of error only
where it would be most favorable to them. Let's say that the margin of
error in the presidential vote nationwide and in Florida is 2% or
more--that would be undervotes, overvotes, in sum, all the votes that
were not countable by the standard method.
The "fairness" that Gore is proposing is to reduce the
margin of error specifically in those places where it will do him the
most good, and thereby win the entire state of Florida by an act of
gross unfairness.
Gore, presumably when the manifest absurdity of his plan becomes clear
even to him, pays momentary lip-service to the idea of a statewide hand
count, but he didn't ask for a statewide hand count after the election.
He only asked for a hand count in known Democratic strongholds.
Watching Gore last night during his appeal for support in pressing his
case was five long minutes of television indeed. Time was stretched to
the snapping point, and had it snapped it would have come in second to
Gore himself in crossing that line.
He seemed to have lost his mind completely when he complained about
"intimidation" of vote counters in Miami-Dade County,
apparently unimpressed by the ability of armed cops, sheriffs, and
federal marshals to police a crowd of noisy demonstrators waving signs
while breaking in their new Topsiders.
For Gore to assert such nonsense shows that he is less than a man,
really, making himself a boy who cries wolf.
One can only imagine how a President Gore would react to chanting
demonstrators outside his White House. Would he feel intimidated? Would
he feel that the right of the people to peaceably assemble to air their
grievances was, as his running mate Joe Lieberman blurted out on Sunday,
nothing less than mob rule?
The good news for Democrats in all this is that they can be done with
Gore once his challenge is properly defeated. The bad news is that they
won't have anyone standing between Hillary Clinton and their 2004
presidential nomination.
11/26
Tragic
Circumstances Intervene; The True Greatness to Come
Yes, the real tragedy of this bottomless election is the way it has
drawn interest away from Hillary Clinton's 2004 presidential
campaign, which began about thirty seconds after the first set of New
York exit polls were finished on November 7th. Not even her husband,
who specializes in being the bride at every wedding and the corpse at
every funeral, has been able to steal back the attention of the American
public for her. After all, this current race for the White House is just
a footnote to the true greatness to come.
As for the Florida long count, let me see if I've finally got this
straight. All Al Gore and Joe Lieberman want is that the
true will of the people be expressed and the spirit of democracy itself
maintained by a "fair, accurate, and complete" hand count of
ballots from three heavily Democratic Florida counties. That's three out
of 67 counties. And what about the rest of the state?
Well, uh, all Al Gore and Joe Lieberman want is a "fair, accurate,
and complete" hand count of ballots from three heavily Democratic
Florida counties. George W. Bush could have asked for hand
counts in those other counties, that was his prerogative, but
George Bush had already won the first count and then the first recount,
so, the logic continues, he didn't want to risk his lead by selecting,
for instance, the most heavily Republican counties and demanding a
recount to preserve the very spirit of democracy the way Al Gore and Joe
Lieberman have.
What's so very interesting about this is that Gore and Lieberman
themselves have actually stepped out in public and with straight,
serious faces declared how hand counting the ballots in just these three
heavily Democratic counties will preserve the "integrity of the
process," or words to that effect. And that this will require
counting votes not actually punched out on the ballot, that is, those
"disenfranchised" indentations ascertained to demonstrate an
act of will decipherable in the democratic heart.
To add hubris to this arrogance, on Friday, Lieberman stood before
microphones and complained about the people demonstrating against this
"fair, accurate, and complete" hand count of ballots in three
heavily Democratic counties. They were attempting to intimidate the
ballot counters, and threatened the "integrity of the
process," he said, in essence.
The most awkward moment of the week came after the U.S. Supreme Court
agreed on Friday to take George Bush's appeal of the Florida Supreme
Court's ruling that the hand counts could continue. Pundits had been
declaring that the Court would never hear such an appeal, because it
would constitute interference in a state's affairs, as if Federal courts
had not been gnawing away at the sovereignty of states for most of the
20th Century. Gore's chief lawyer, David Boies, had dismissed
Bush's appeal as having no issues of interest to the Court.
After the Court took the case, pundits were dumbstruck at such an
unprecedented move. The New York Times' Supreme Court reporter Linda
Greenhouse cleverly buried the issues of interest to the Court in
the seventh paragraph of her Saturday page one lead story with the full
banner headline. The Court specifically identified, in her words,
"the prerogatives that a state legislature enjoys under federal law
and the United States Constitution to determine how a state's
presidential electors are to be appointed."
More ominous still, but practically brushed aside in denial by the
pundits, was the decision of the Florida legislature to join Bush in the
appeal.
And there, it has happened again, my attention drawn away from
the triumph of Hillary Clinton by the Black Hole Election, from which no
light escapes. True greatness just can't catch a break.
11/24
No Rest for the Weary; No Mercy for
the Afflicted
I had seen everything, I thought, after the segment on Miracle Pets (the PAX network,
on Channel 31
here in Manhattan) where the young crow nurtures a lonely kitten
back to health, but then along came the Presidential election 2000.
Barely an eyelash has been batted, a drink lifted, a sigh exhaled, or a
word exchanged for 18 days now in this town, or any town, that has not
been chilled in the shadow of this dark extravaganza.
On the day of the election itself I experienced a satisfying if vague
euphoria from being certain that the stilted, remorseless contest between Weird Al and Woozy
Dubya would be decided by nine or ten that evening. But no, it wouldn't end.
It lives on like a bad smell rising from the basement of an old house.
It's not suspenseful, but a deep annoying anxiety. It's not a civics
lesson, unless that means a living handbook on Chicago ward politics
passed on orally by the late Boss Richard Daley to his son, Bill
Daley, the chairman of the Gore campaign.
Throughout the agonizing process it became apparent that Al Gore
was keeping his promise that he would do anything to become President. He's weird,
nasty, and frankly possessed of a monstrously ill-concealed confusion of
character the nature of which flew right over the head of virtually every commentator but Camille
Paglia.
George Bush, on the other hand, is bedeviled by the English
language itself,
and while not appearing, as his frightening opponent does, to have been
made up by the make-up artist at the local mortician, nonetheless seems
incapable of expressing himself in a full three dimensions.
This spectacle promised no relief, with recounts and long counts and no
accounts merging into one spasmodic, endless "Breaking Story."
On MSNBC, the official cable news organ of the Gore campaign, the terror
in the eyes of the likes of Ashleigh Banfield was palpable every
time some loose quantum of news jumped in Bush's direction, despite the
best efforts of the entire MSNBC staff to reach down into death itself
and resurrect their man's chances each and every time they so much as
dimmed.
On Tuesday night, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that the long count
could continue for five more days, creating more confusion than clarity,
as one county gave up on Wednesday morning, saying that wasn't enough
time. Also on Wednesday morning Dick Cheney, who pulled off the
one miracle of the campaign by retaining his dignity, had a heart
attack, which was entirely appropriate to the occasion. Later on
Wednesday the Bush team made it known that they were
headed for the U.S. Supreme Court.
See Lynette Warren's excellent The Great Florida Vote Hunt
elsewhere in Union Square Journal for more details on the long count in
the Sunshine State.
* * *
Back at
the beginning of November I witnessed an omen, unrecognized by me at the time,
that it would be one of history's strangest months. Curiosity sent me to a reading and book
signing by Karen Finley at Barnes & Noble on the Square. I had
of course heard about Finley many times over the years, often in the
context of her having smeared chocolate over her body as part of one of
her performances, but I had never seen her in action.
Finley is wiry thin with smoldering red hair and she employs a deep
reading voice that is how one expects a drunk madwomen to sound, veering it occasionally into the outer fringes of a black dialect.
Between pieces, when she makes comments to the audience, her normal voice is, well, normal, not unlike the careful,
pleasant intonation and diction of a steadfast arts and crafts instructor.
But back into a reading and three more clicks would put her in Linda Blair
range.
The subject matter of the reading was a blur of sordid references, to a
father molesting his daughter, to self-hatred, suicide, a variety of sexual
recriminations and recreations, all in the mad drunk's voice. And between
the outpourings of the heavy, almost dorky, readings, it was right back to
the normal, almost sweet everyday voice.
"I guess I am angry," she says in her real voice. I
wonder, did she just find that out?
It's quite an act. It goes on so long about pain so deep and so adolescent
that the execution of her parents without trial would no doubt find
supporters in the audience.
Just as I had convinced myself that it was all a simple concoction of art,
a mere performance, the questions from the audience begin.
"Where do you get your inspiration?"
"From my relationships," Finley answers. And I wonder about the
unsuspecting soul who might slip off into the evening with the arts and
crafts instructor only to be introduced to the drunk madwoman circa 4:00
a.m.
"Were you spying on my childhood?" asks another friendly member
of the audience.
"I want to write about unresolved childhood traumas," says
Finley. No kidding.
"Licorice is my overall favorite candy," she announces.
I've kept some in my coat pocket ever since.
* * *
I was dragged by my attorney last Saturday to the Chase Championships
semi-final matches at Madison Square Garden. We made a brief stop-off at
her luxurious suite of offices in the Empire State Building,
where we had to cut through the Au Bon Pain on 33rd Street to avoid
standing on a long line with tourists at the Fifth Avenue entrance. She
retrieved a pair of binoculars from her office, a good move, and we
hurried off to the Garden, two avenue blocks west.
"Why the semi-finals instead of the finals?" I asked.
"A lot more tennis," she said, "and you'll want to see Anna
Kournikova; she's not going to make it to the finals."
Indeed, Kournikova is something to behold, the most comely enchantment
not just of tennis but of all professional sports. Yes, worth a look,
but still hardly an excuse for putting up with four hours of tennis.
Anna, whose famed beauty has never helped her actually win a tournament,
made things immediately interesting by breaking the wizardly Martina
Hingis to go up 5-4 in the first set, but Hingis broke her right
back and then held serve to take over the lead at 6-5. Kournikova held
her serve for 6-all, and then Martina put her away in the tie-breaker to
win the first set.
It was at that point that I considered repairing to the cocktail lounge
in the corridor, but I recognized that it might be a long time before
I'd have another opportunity to watch a women's tennis match without
having to listen to Mary Carillo explain it to me, so I hung in
there.
Taking up my attorney's binoculars I scanned the crowd and the closest I
found to celebrities in the arena were a few well-groomed men who
resembled Adlai Stevenson (who came to mind only because one of
the characters in Gore Vidal's The Best Man, now in revival at
the Virginia, is based on him). But I would like to say to the
fellow wearing the light grey turtleneck in Section 85 who was
accompanied by the woman in the black cardigan that he is clearly a very
lucky man.
Ms. Hingis, beguiling in her own right, soon dispatched the alluring
Anna to take the match, after which I was disappointed to find that the
cocktail lounge on our level had still not opened. I returned to
my seat and nosed around the crowd some more with the binoculars.
Next up were Monica Seles and Elena Dementieva. Seles is
well-known, of course, as the player once on her way to an era of
dominance in the women's game when, during a 1993 match in Germany, a
nut ran onto the court and stabbed her. Seven years later she is still
battling to get back to the top, and admirably so. She entered the Chase
late and with some ferocity, antagonized by the decision to hold the
tournament in Germany for the next three years, where Seles has vowed to
never play again because of the stabbing.
She showed her determination by giving Dementieva the bum's rush, 6-1,
in the first set.
In the second set Seles appeared to tire--she was grunting much louder
than she had in the first--as Dementieva worked her way back into the
match. It went to a tie-breaker. Monica caught her second wind and
belted out the points to win the match and go to the final.
The next day I caught the end of the final on television. Hingis held Seles
off, after Seles won the first set in a tie-breaker, and won the
tournament two sets to one. But Seles had the look of someone who will
not be denied, ultimately, from taking back the destiny that was stolen
from her seven years ago in Germany.
© Union Square Journal 2000
|
|